The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040.
The line graph illustrates the number of city dwellers in four distinguished Asian from a report between 1970 and 2020, with estimation until 2040.
What stands out from the graph is that the percentage of polulation in all four countries witnessed an upward trend, in which that of Malaysia went up the most dramatically.
Starting at the highest point in 1970, just over 30% of citizens in the Philippines lived in the city. After some fluctuations over the first 40 years, this figure has risen and is predicted to reach continual rise by around 20% to the end of the period. Malaysian city dwellers which ranked second at 30% at the beginning has made a significant progress. It, in addition, is hoped to keep its upward trend till the final year to over 80%, more than double the first-year figure.
Finally, the two remaining categories of inhabitants living in the city of Thailand and Indonesia, which accounted for about nearly 20% and over 10% respectively, showed upward trends throughout the 30-year period. After meeting the same point in 2000, Indonesian city dwellers have surpassed the figure of Thailand and the Philippines, which is then estimated to be the second highest at 60%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- the table below gives information on the frequency of using internet by adults in one European country between 2006 to 2010 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 15 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant. 73
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 56
- The pie chart below shows the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, so, then, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9603960396 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72387016569 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618811881188 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9695820912 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21504927371 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887883120023 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957151683877 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149339199294 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100345773501 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.