The graph below gives information about the sales of the three most commonly purchased items in a particular bakery for the year 2014

Essay topics:

The graph below gives information about the sales of the three most commonly purchased items in a particular bakery for the year 2014

The line graph details the amount of money that was spent in the bakery over 12 months from January 2014 to December 2014. Three kinds of Bakery’s sales are detailed. 
Focusing on money that was paid for pies, it started with the lowest amount in the year at $10000. However, that quantity steadily increased until December when accounted for exactly $40000.

Looking at bread and buns sales, the money spent in both bakery did not follow a clear pattern. Bread accounted for $80000 in January. Following this, values went down and went up through the year. On the other hand, bun’s sales showed $40000 in the first month, that value increased over 4 months. In contrast, sales decreased until December when reported $30000.

Overall, it is clear for the data that, pies’ sales can be predicted over time. Another interesting pattern is that bread’s sales were the most popular bakery during 2014 and the value of its sales always was between 4 and 8 times higher than pies’ sales. 

Votes
Average: 8.6 (9 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-10-12 nhinhi999 51 view
2019-07-27 raznava 86 view
Essays by user raznava :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, look, in contrast, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14371257485 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75640391792 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634730538922 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7716027289 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193290176953 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765319577589 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467694379867 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126312989869 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518739973112 0.0819641961636 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.