The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the number of participants in five different types of activities at a particular social centre in Melbourne, Australia, from 2000 to 2020.
Overall, the trend for film clubs and martial arts has been steadily increasing over the years, with film remaining the most popular choice at the centre. In addition, the number of participants in table tennis and musical theatre has increased significantly, while the opposite is true for amateur drama.
Throughout the period, the film club has consistently received the highest participation rate, with around 65 members, although it has dropped to a low of 60 in 2010. A similar but more common pattern of failure has been observed for martial arts membership, which fluctuates between 30 and 36 participants.
Meanwhile, amateur drama was the only activity that saw a decline. Although it increased slightly from around 26 to a peak of nearly 30 members in its first year, it steadily declined thereafter, ending with around 5 members and becoming the least popular success.
In contrast, table tennis demonstrated a gradual increase in popularity, starting from around 16 members and reaching 20 members in 2010, eventually doubling. Similarly, musical performances, which began in 2005, grew rapidly, reaching nearly 20 participants after 15 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-06 | bassmodulators123 | 67 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | bassmodulators123 | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-14 | dorae | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-04 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-04 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 73
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the Internet and what solutions can you suggest 89
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 84
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, similarly, so, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42307692308 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99123472952 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629807692308 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9316793502 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.333333333 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160920058187 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694734395967 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904114553137 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103408829024 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109535792483 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, similarly, so, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42307692308 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99123472952 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629807692308 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9316793502 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.333333333 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160920058187 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694734395967 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904114553137 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103408829024 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109535792483 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.