The graph below presents the employment patterns in the USA between 1930 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words

The graph chart provides information about employment trends in various spheres of economy in the USA between 1930 and 2010.

There are two basic general trends: downward and upward. As regards the first, the employment rate for the fishing, farming and foresting was down dramatically over given period, falling from almost 75% in 1930 to just under 5% in 2010.

By contrast the employment opportunities for the other three industry sectors went up by varying degrees. There was a gradual rise in technical forces during the first four decades, followed by a substantial increase from approximately 10% in 1970 to just over one third in 2010. Furthermore, the industrial workforce experienced a sudden uprise from almost 0% in 1930-1960 to 35% in 2000 and remained same there till 2010. Meanwhile, the number of sales and office workers rose up steadily during a period with insignificant fluctuations, the employment in other services continued to stagnate for over 80 years except for the modest rise in 1940.

Overall, the USA employment market was mostly dependant on farming, fishing and foresting in the first half of the 20th century. However, in recent years there was an increasing demand on industrial and technical employees.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 47, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
...l, the USA employment market was mostly dependant on farming, fishing and foresting in th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...first half of the 20th century. However, in recent years there was an increasing ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, third, while, as regards, except for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.245 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82566363886 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4458755964 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.555555556 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126906857875 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553127117374 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696692496405 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999245117372 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081634459191 0.0819641961636 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.