The graph below show the amount spend by teenagers on the fast food in britain . The units are amount spends is pounds per week in the first figure income group grams per week in the secound figer.

Essay topics:

The graph below show the amount spend by teenagers on the fast food in britain . The units are amount spends is pounds per week in the first figure income group grams per week in the secound figer.

The given line graph reveals the fast food in britain . It is clear hamburgers . Fish chips and pizza . The years 1970 and 1985 . It is collaborate pound per week and gram per week.

It can be seen that high income it is increased and 50 per week pound . However in fish chips it decreased finished that 30 per week pound . Whereever pizza it is well down in and per week pound. Secondly is 1970 in the fish chips downup added at 98 per week gram. But in 1980 pizza it exchanced finished at 200 per week gram . But in 1985 in hamburgers and that is down up 205 per week gram.
Overall it is amount aways the spend and tangerous on the fish chips food in britain pizza it can be income 8 per week pound hom burgers it is 45 gram per week.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-07-31 Gurjant singh2 22 view
2018-07-31 Gurjant singh2 56 view
2018-07-31 Gurjant singh2 56 view
2018-07-31 Gurjant singh2 56 view
Essays by user Gurjant singh2 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e graph reveals the fast food in britain . It is clear hamburgers . Fish chips and...
^^
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...food in britain . It is clear hamburgers . Fish chips and pizza . The years 1970 a...
^^
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... clear hamburgers . Fish chips and pizza . The years 1970 and 1985 . It is collabo...
^^
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...hips and pizza . The years 1970 and 1985 . It is collaborate pound per week and gr...
^^
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'collaborated'.
Suggestion: collaborated
...pizza . The years 1970 and 1985 . It is collaborate pound per week and gram per week. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orate pound per week and gram per week. It can be seen that high income it is in...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...me it is increased and 50 per week pound . However in fish chips it decreased fini...
^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...it is increased and 50 per week pound . However in fish chips it decreased finished tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ecreased finished that 30 per week pound . Whereever pizza it is well down in and ...
^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... exchanced finished at 200 per week gram . But in 1985 in hamburgers and that is d...
^^
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and that is down up 205 per week gram. Overall it is amount aways the spend and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 28, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... Overall it is amount aways the spend and tangerous on the fish chips food in...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second, secondly, well

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 14.0 33.7804878049 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 591.0 965.302439024 61% => OK
No of words: 144.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.10416666667 4.92477711251 83% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.46410161514 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.05005131825 2.65546596893 77% => OK
Unique words: 65.0 106.607317073 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451388888889 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 160.2 283.868780488 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6105314737 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 49.25 112.824112599 44% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.0 22.9334400587 52% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 1.69756097561 707% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441648169918 0.215688989381 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174787018907 0.103423049105 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131493943365 0.0843802449381 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.356202939478 0.15604864568 228% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516765171583 0.0819641961636 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 3.9 13.2329268293 29% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 101.59 61.2550243902 166% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 2.1 10.3012195122 20% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 5.61 11.4140731707 49% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.21 8.06136585366 77% => OK
difficult_words: 18.0 40.7170731707 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 11.4329268293 35% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 4.0 11.0658536585 36% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.