The graph below show the participation of Australian children in sports outside school hours in 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The given bar graph compares the participation of Australian boys and girls in various sports outside school hours in 2014.
Overall, it is seen from the graph that the majority of boys football sports in 2014 while, girls choose netball sports in 2014.
Almost 20% of boys participate in football sports outside the school hours and only 2% participate in netball sports. In contrast, a very high percentage of girls participate in netball sports with approximately 18% and the least percentage of girls participate in football sports with around 4%. It is interesting to note that only 5% of boys and girls did not participate in any sports.
In terms of swimming, girls were more participants than boys at around 16% and 13% respectively. In basketball sports, seen opposing trends compare to swimming sports with around 16% of boys participate and girls at just under 16%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-28 | chathurika2008@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The following graphs illustrate electronic gaming trends in South Korea in 2006 The first outlines gamer age groups and gender demographics The second indicates game type preference Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features an 84
- The graph below shows the sales of children's books, adult fiction and educational books between 2002 and 2006 in one country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below show the participation of Australian children in sports outside school hours in 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 746.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 146.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1095890411 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47606760199 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80895413035 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6052012714 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.571428571 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204365080555 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126302069942 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963671318053 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166617246952 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924161922769 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.58 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 18.0 40.7170731707 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.