The given bar chart illustrates the employment percentage distribution of men and women falling under the age bracket of 60 to 64 in four different countries(Belgium,USA,Japan and Indonesia) over a time span of two seperate years (1970 and 2000) respectively.
Overall, it is observed that the employability rate of men remained higher in both the years as compared to women. Moreover, the percentage of people being employed was higher in 1970 than in 2000.
In the year 1997 , the number of men employed in Belgium, Japan and Indonesia were considerably higher than women . In all the three countries, men lead women in terms of employment by almost around 20% as opposed to a marginal differencce of approximately 6% in the USA.
Going forward , this gap of employability rates widened even more in countries like Belgium and USA where men overtook women by a whopping 40% increase. This was then followed by 30% jump in Indonesia .Lastly, the marginal increase of around 6% among both genders was observed only in Japan.
- The graph below show the percentage of men and woman aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main
- The chart below shows the proportion of male and female students studying six art related subjects at a UK university in 2011 84
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given 73
- The chart below shows the proportion of male and female students studying six art related subjects at a UK university in 2011 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , USA
...to 64 in four different countriesBelgium,USA,Japan and Indonesia over a time span of...
^^^^
Line 5, column 17, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n 1970 than in 2000. In the year 1997 , the number of men employed in Belgium, ...
^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...esia were considerably higher than women . In all the three countries, men lead wo...
^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ximately 6% in the USA. Going forward , this gap of employability rates widened...
^^
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s then followed by 30% jump in Indonesia .Lastly, the marginal increase of around ...
^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Lastly
...then followed by 30% jump in Indonesia .Lastly, the marginal increase of around 6% amo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, moreover, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05294117647 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28042703169 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8860271106 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.714285714 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188705513797 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091980665119 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587813640775 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122093802082 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487265555717 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.