The given graph compares how much energy was generated from three different sources to provide New York with electricity from 1980 to 2000.
Overall, the amount of electricity created from coal decreased while the figures for natural gas and petroleum increased. Throughout the period, petroleum played the most important role in generating electricity for New York.
In 1980, petroleum was the main source of electricity for New York, generating about 360 million KWH of electricity. Followed by coal – from which over 200 million KWH of electricity was manufactured. That nearly 100 million KWH of electricity was created from coal made it the least preferred source of electricity production in this year.
The production of electricity from petroleum continuously increased in the following 5 years, to 600 million KWH in 1985. This figure then fell down to around 370 million KWH in 1990 before rose significantly to a peak of 740 million KWH in 2000. The amount of electricity from coal witnessed a slight increase to 300 million KWH in 1985 before constantly declined in the other years while electricity manufacturing from natural gas steadily grew during the whole period, overtook coal in 1990 and reached over 500 million KWH in 2000.
(201 words)
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 90
- In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are the causes And what will be the effects on society 89
- The line graph shows the number of trips to other countries by UK residents for various purposes between 1989 and 2001 78
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 203 200
No. of Characters: 1033 1000
No. of Different Words: 104 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.775 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.089 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.837 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 72 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 57 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 40 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 34 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.3 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.799 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.3 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.485 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.485 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.243 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 4