The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph provides data on how much energy was consumed in America from 1980 to 2008 along with predictions until 2030.
At the first glance, it is clear that the trend of using different type of energy sources have been growing in the United States. However, Americans have been more inclined to use fossil fuels, especially Petrol and Oil compared to the little usages of renewable and nuclear energy.
In 1980, petrol and oil consumption stood at 35 quadrillion which was much more higher than that of coal and natural gas (with 16 and 20 quadrillion units respectively). At the same time, the eco-friendly and nuclear energy’ s utilization was relatively insignificant, standing at only 4 quadrillion units of each.
The consumption of petrol and oil fluctuated between 1980 and 1995 before rising until the time of report. This figure was predicted to continuously grow and reach a peak of 48 quadrillion in 2030. Besides, the figure of coal saw a constant increase during the whole period, it overtook natural gas in 1990 and was expected to become the second most used fuel in 2030 with over 30 quadrillion. Consumption of energy derived from natural gas has been erratic until 2015 before levelling off at about 25 quadrillion units in 2030.
While the use of solar/wind and nuclear has seen an upward trend, respectively to 5 and 7 quadrillion units, the consumption of hydropower projected to slightly decrease in the end of period, with just under 4 quadrillion.
(250 words)
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 90
- In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are the causes And what will be the effects on society 89
- The line graph shows the number of trips to other countries by UK residents for various purposes between 1989 and 2001 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
... stood at 35 quadrillion which was much more higher than that of coal and natural gas with ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95634920635 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82228237031 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 106.607317073 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4319680211 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.9 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160592325327 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657217147579 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649470921972 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961826854747 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703230787818 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.