The graph illustrates the statistic of energy consumption in the United States over the course of 40 years starting in 1980 and projected to 2030.
Overall, looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that petrol oil and coal experienced a significant upward trend while other sources of energy demonstrate some fluctuation throughout the period. By the way, the usage of petrol and oil power accounts for the highest and the consumption of hydropower presents the lowest.
Over the period, petrol and oil are the dominant fuel sources with 35 units was used in 1980. This figure fluctuated from 1980 to 1995 then maintained a steady increase and expected to continue rising until reaching over 45 units in 2030. A similar trend was witnessed in the usage of coal and natural gas with the starting point of over 5q and 20q respectively. However, gas showed an initial fall and coal has a gradual increase. Then, both of them are equally used in 2015 with about 24 units. Coal is projected to surge to 31q while gas remains 24q in 2030.
In 1980, energy from nuclear, solar, and hydropower was equally used with 4q. Over the period, nuclear rose to 6q, meanwhile, the two left kinds of power oscillated. These numbers are predicted to maintain this level until 2030 except for a slight increase in nuclear and solar/wind power.
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services
- The graph below shows the US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...crease in nuclear and solar/wind power.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, then, while, except for, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87719298246 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57261425517 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570175438596 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1877538008 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6666666667 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15153436118 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584024507254 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469619489658 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100711612479 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430106565888 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.