The line graph illustrates how much money was spent on books in four different countries from 1995 to 2005.
Overall, there was an increase in the amount of money spent on expanding books in France and Austria. Meanwhile, the figures for Italy and Germany experienced fluctuations between 1995 and 2005. In addition, the amount of money German people expended on books was the highest during the period.
About 80 million dollars was used to expand books in Germany in 1995, followed by a significant increase to 90 million dollars in 1999, and then declined slightly to 84 million dollars in 2003, before ending the period at 95 million dollars. The similarity can be seen in the figure for Austria, which started at 50 million dollars in 1995, after which it experienced growth to 55 million dollars in 1997, then returned to 50 million dollars in 1999, and ended at 62 million dollars in 2005.
The amount of money French people spent on books started at 55 million dollars in 1995, with a subsequent jump to 70 million dollars in 2001, before ending the period at 75 million dollars. A similar pattern was also be seen in the figure for Austria, which was at 30 million dollars in 1995, after which rose sharply to 40 million dollars in 1999 and remain virtually unchanged until 2001 and rocketed to the north of 70 million dollars in the last year of the period.
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes some health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 84
- An increasing number of people are buying what they need online What are the advantages and disadvantages for both individuals and companies to shop online 95
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 67
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Write at least 150 words
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7375 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41139871237 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454166666667 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.6358226341 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.125 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170115735601 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127230197959 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795263394104 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164181785858 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107226805823 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.