Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes some health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar
Do you agree or disagree?
It is confirmed that ready food and drinks include a high proportion of sugar, which can result in various health hazards. Although some claim that should drive up sugary products’ prices to motivate people to consume less sugar, I maintain the opinion that they should find alternatives to deal with this problem.
On the one hand, the idea of boosting prices for less consumption of sugar is beneficial for several reasons. Firstly, eating products that have a large amount of sugar excessively can threaten people’s well-being, particularly diabetes, obesity, and cardiovascular diseases. Children, if they consume too much junk food, soft drinks, or candies, might cope with tooth decay. Therefore, increasing the prices of those products could reduce the rate of people having these mentioned health problems. Due to the higher prices, the number of people who can afford them can be decreased, they are more likely to avoid unhealthy diets and are willing to obtain healthy eating habits which can strengthen their physical and mental health.
Despite the above-mentioned ideas, I believe that instead of rising sugar product prices, people should work out other measures. Eating sweet food could bring about happiness and provide energy for people, it’s also an efficient tool to appease children when they become annoyed or disobey. As a result of growing prices, there is a wide range of people do not want to buy them regularly, this can lead children to be more stubborn and lose their childhood joy. From my point of view, people should heighten awareness about the characteristics of the products and the consequences of consuming too many sugary products in order to manage their rations.
In conclusion, while people believe that sugar might contribute to health issues and these products need to be risen in price to guide people to slighter sugar consumption and stay healthier, it seems to me that ones should be well aware of the level of sugar they eat in each meal instead of increase the prices.
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 67
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 84
- An increasing number of people are buying what they need online What are the advantages and disadvantages for both individuals and companies to shop online 95
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes some health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Write at least 150 words
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14803625378 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62528898922 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601208459215 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0652769639 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5833333333 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363675378895 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129425833732 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744842894295 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243313203535 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062363476417 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14803625378 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62528898922 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601208459215 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0652769639 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5833333333 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363675378895 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129425833732 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744842894295 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243313203535 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062363476417 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.