The line chart elucidates the quantity of waste manufactured of three companies A, B, C among the year 2000 and 2015.
Overall, the period had witnessed a noticeable drop in the amount of waste produced of company A and B, however, the tendency of the figure of waste demonstrated by company C is negatively correlated.
As a deep analysis of the chart disclosure, it is indisputable that on the first half decade, the number of waste fabricated by company A experienced a slight lull from 12 to 10 tons before having a moderate decline to under 9 tons in 2015. The propensity of the amount of waste produced by company B had a similar fashion with company A on the last decade from 2005 to 2015, after having a significant fall from the high point of 10 tons to 3 tons, it saw a modest growth of 1 tons, from 9 tons to 10 tons.
Turning into more detail, the reverse was true for the production of waste by company C, it increased markedly from over 3 tons to 6 tons among 5 year then it saw a appreciable acceleration to over 9 tons in 2015.
- The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 Link table https drive google com file d 1bN1Kakm812OcI3ntl5QQlne RNQC5d M view 56
- Schools should teach children some academic subjects which will be beneficial to their future careers Therefore other subjects such as music and sports are not important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The bar chart below shows the number of men and women studying engineering at Australian universities 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 164, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tons to 6 tons among 5 year then it saw a appreciable acceleration to over 9 tons...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.36224489796 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76827444423 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525510204082 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.5070292138 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.0 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.2 22.9334400587 171% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264823168826 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16065715312 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076264459557 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185197550283 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644813594996 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.1 10.3012195122 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.6 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.