The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 Link table https drive google com file d 1bN1Kakm812OcI3ntl5QQlne RNQC5d M view

The table elucidates the figure of labour force and silk mills in the England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.
Overall the number of workers had witnessed a sharply downward trend over the period, however, the quantity of factories was negatively correlated in the tendency.
As a deep analysis of the chart disclosure, it is explicitly observed that in the year 1851, it was lump of labour, after having a tremendous sull to 109.869 the next decade, the number of employees experienced a enormous decline to 91412 in the year 1871 and 67904 in the year 1881, before plummeting to 49025 and 38942 among the year 1891 and 1901.
Giving a shufty on this period, it is lucid that from 1851 to 1861, the number of mills appreciable accelebration to 761 before seeing a slight lull to 693 in the year 1871, after it saw a modest drop to 663 and 623 on the last decade, the figure of factories underwent a minimal climb to 702 in the year 1881

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...de, the number of employees experienced a enormous decline to 91412 in the year 1...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 768.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51764705882 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51401607326 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 22.4926829268 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.610635621 43.030603864 234% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 192.0 112.824112599 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 42.5 22.9334400587 185% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152688466538 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108631577123 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912600427599 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108631577123 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0912600427599 0.0819641961636 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.1 13.2329268293 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.23 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.1 10.3012195122 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.82 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.9970731707 171% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.