The graph below shows the amounts spent on apparel on the Internet in the USA and Japan between 1999 and 2003.
Given is the graph illustrating the number of money spent on apparel online in America and Japan from 1999 to 2003.
It is clear that in the first years, the amounts took money on apparel in Japan is more dominant than in the USA. However, as the years went by the spending habits of the two countries became almost identical.
In 1999, the Japanese who used the Internet for apparel was as twice as the Americans did, at 10 and 5 millions of dollars. After that, two figures continued a stable climb with slight acceleration to 12 and 10 million respectively in the following year.
A notable fact is that after a mild increase from 2000, the percentages plunged with 7 million of Japan and USA reached 8 million. Two data followed by a growth pattern that was more varied, they abruptly surged to the highest point at 20% in 2003.
- The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education. The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared. 80
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The table below shows the percentages of people joining in seven different sports in a European country from 1999 to 2009. 89
- When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...s twice as the Americans did, at 10 and 5 millions of dollars. After that, two figures contin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 693.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58940397351 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46532018308 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635761589404 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 205.2 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 11.1849023606 43.030603864 26% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.0 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252475994366 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108916348178 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108850709422 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156531872434 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0969838560369 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.