The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary (Yen) from 1953 to 1983, and the prices of black and white television and colour television during the same period.
Given is the graph illustrating the money which is paid per month between 1953 and 1983, and the cost of two types of television at the same time.
It is clear that the number of the salary followed a stable climb with slight acceleration from 1953 to 1983. By contrast, the line of two kinds of TV plummeted during the examined period.
To embark on, the appearance of colour TV was later and had a high cost of 100 thousand, but it experienced a slight lull to fewer than 50 thousand then until 1983. Likewise, standing at the highest point at 110 thousand in 1953, there was a rapid decrease of 110 thousands to 70 thousand before 1963. After that, the price of black and white TV continued to discount gradually to 20 thousand in 1983.
However, the salary was negatively correlated. Although there was a mere minority of the salary in the first year, it jumped further to over 30 yen after 1973. A notable fact is that the figure for this saw appreciable acceleration to nearly 70 yen after 30 years.
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom. Do you think the advantages of this development overweight the disadvantages? 60
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 73
- Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The pie charts below give information about the household expenditure of an average US family in different years 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, likewise, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55737704918 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52169066813 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606557377049 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6125344051 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6666666667 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246974401958 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902358780658 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640018806835 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138648964443 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614469092184 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.