The line graph indicates how much carbon dioxide emitted in four countries; the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal per person from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, it is clear that while there were upward trends in the CO2 emission in Portugal and Italy, the figure for the United Kingdom and Sweden experienced the opposite trend.
Looking at the changes in more detail, we can see that in 1967 the CO2 emission of Protegual was about 1.5 Metric Tonnes (MT) per person. Having seen a moderate rise to reach just under 4 in 1987, following a slight increase until 1997 in 5(MT), when the number leveled off till 2007. In 1967, Italian's CO2 emission per person was about 4.1(MT) per person, after a sharp increase in the following year reached just over 6(MT). For the three years later with a moderate fluctuation reached 7.9(MT), where became stable until the end of the period.
On the other hand, the two other countries, in 1967 the United Kingdom and Sweden were at the first and second positions of emitting CO2(11(MT) and 8.5(MT) respectively). For Sweden, the figure dramatically went up to a peak of nearly 10.4(MT) in 1977, then experienced a significant decrease to reach 7(MT) in 1987. For three years the amount of CO2 emission declined steadily until 2007 it was at the same level as Portugal about 7(MT). The United Kingdom CO2 emission experienced a smooth decrease from about 11(MT) to 8.5(MT) at the end of the period.
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 61
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 56
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 84
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74898785425 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36525966384 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550607287449 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.6102014268 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.3 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235036476196 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100178417124 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729291899698 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163927695334 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629750761265 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.