the graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the united kingdom, sweden,italy, and portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The provided graph compares how much carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the united kingdom, Italy, Sweden and Portugal over a forty-year.
Overall, it can be seen that the amount of CO2 emissions in Italy and Portugal showed a significant increase whereas in the united kingdom and Sweden's emission rate decreased considerably between 1967 and 2007.
According to the data, regarding CO2 emission in Portugal was just below 2% in 1967, which meant that the lowest figure compared to other countries and then increased significantly until 1997. However, the figure remained stable in a decade. Similarly, Italy's emissions per person were just above 4% in 1967 and rose steadily to 8% after that it stayed the same at the end of the period.
On the other hand, the amount of CO2 emissions in the united kingdom had the highest figure with nearly 11% in 1967. then, there was a dramatic decrease of almost 3% until 2007. Meanwhile, CO2 emissions in Sweden accounted for 9% at the beginning of the period. Despite increasing significantly and reaching a peak at just above one-tenth, the figure then fell sharply to almost 5%, reaching at the same figure as Portugal emission tonnes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-14 | damladogan | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-31 | Audric | 78 | view |
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 73
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the united kingdom, sweden,italy, and portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both these views and give y 73
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014. 11
- The charts below show the proportions of british students at one one university in england who were able to speak other languages in addition to english, in 2000 and 2010. summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make co 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...ingdom, Italy, Sweden and Portugal over a forty-year. Overall, it can be seen that the am...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Then
...highest figure with nearly 11% in 1967. then, there was a dramatic decrease of almos...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, similarly, so, then, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61287204542 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562814070352 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6991773247 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.555555556 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435962614666 0.215688989381 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170759930932 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147597746972 0.0843802449381 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299306770531 0.15604864568 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129092003994 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.