An emission of carbon dioxide per person in four different countries during 40 years, from 1967 to 2007 is presented in the line chart.
Initially, around 11 metric tonnes per person in the United Kingdom produce carbon dioxide in 1967, while the number of Sweden was 2 points below the former one. However, after 40 years the one of the United Kingdom showed a dramatic decline to 9 metric tonnes, but the other country (Sweden) had a slight rise from 9 to 11 metric tonnes before continue to fall sharply, with 5 metric tonnes.
On the other hand, in 1967 the average of those in Italy stood at around 5 metric tonnes when the one of Portugal had 5 points bellow the former. Furthermore, at the half of the period, both countries rose sharply to approximately 7 and 3 metric tonnes, and not slowing down until the final quarter of the year. Although, those showing a significant increase, the proportion of carbon dioxide in the United Kingdom was by far the highest used.
Overall, the average of carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom and Sweden showed a dramatic fall, while the other two countries increase during this period. However, the one of those in the United Kingdom was the highest proportion.
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 89
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 78
- The number of tourists visiting Malaysia and Dubai from 1995 to 2003 is presented below. 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 73
- The graph below shows the availability of various sweeteners in the USA from 1966 to 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77102803738 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42804116034 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509345794393 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7168193134 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.625 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227729788986 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114577329197 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790647397878 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160535062613 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347459222337 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.