The line chart compares the average carbon dioxide emissions of people living in four different European countries over a 40-year period.
Overall, the average carbon dioxide emissions per person in Italy and Portugal experienced an upward trend between 1967 and 2007, while emissions in the UK and Sweden witnessed a downward trend over this period. However, the average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the UK still ranked first despite the decrease.
As the graph shows, starting at approximately 11 tonnes in 1967, the average carbon dioxide emission per person in the UK decreased steadily to around 9 tonnes in 2007, but it still ranked first during the whole period. Emissions in Sweden first experienced a sharp increase from about 9 tonnes in 1967 to above 10 in 1977. Then it declined significantly to below 6 tonnes in 2007.
By contrast, the emissions in Italy saw considerable growth from around 4 tonnes in 1967 to above 6 in 1977. Afterward, it rose steadily to just below 8 tonnes in 1997, before leveling off at this figure between 1997 and 2007. Italy's emissions also surpassed Sweden and became the second-highest after 1987. Regarding the emissions in Portugal, it rose steadily from approximately 1 tonne to about 5 in 1997, then it remains stable between 1997 and 2007.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 73
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05092592593 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69343798818 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49537037037 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5020201608 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.1 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297417368191 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129312675524 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695440308046 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189751909705 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814570101608 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.