Many people are living in foreign countries nowadays. While some argue that living in a nation where you must speak a foreign language can result in serious social and practical problems, I partly agree with this view and believe that most of these problems are not serious.
Admittedly, some social and practical problems may occur when people are living in a foreign country where you have to speak a foreign language. The most serious problem is that one may find it difficult to fit in the local culture, which means that local people do not see him or her as a member of their community and refuse to share useful information. This often happens when people can not speak the language like a native or have a different appearance. As a result, this would put pressure on your work and daily life. Moreover, as foreigners are not accepted by local residents, they tend to form their own community with cultures that are different from that country. This means that there are many communities with various or even conflict cultures, which possibly leads to social instability and a higher crime rate.
On the other hand, the aforementioned problems can be solved or alleviated before they become too serious. By enforcing non-discriminative laws and policies, governments can build a friendly environment for foreigners. For example, encouraging companies to offer equal job opportunities for both local residents and foreigners is an effective way to reduce problems caused by unsatisfied foreigners. In addition, foreigners ought to respect local cultures and make their contributions to society. If someone helps the local community, donating to a local charity, for example, people will appreciate him or her regardless of his or her nationality.
To conclude, while I agree that some social and practical problems may occur when people live in a country where they have to speak a foreign language, I do not think these problems are serious since they can be solved properly.
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 42
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 67
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both view and give your opinion 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, while, as for, for example, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09480122324 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84454304788 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51376146789 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0993005066 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412765149708 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139299438913 0.084324248473 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137794809682 0.0667982634062 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297636683762 0.151304729494 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127222445833 0.056905535591 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.