The first map illustrates the layout of Grange Park in 1920 while the second one gives information about how this park has changed by now.
Overall, Grange Park has experienced significant changes since 1920, including the demolishment of several old facilities and the construction of new ones. Today, there are more entertainment facilities like the children's play area and cafe in Grange Park.
In 1920, there was a fountain located in the center of Grange Park with a stage for musicians to its east. Two entrances were sited in the north and south side of this park, connecting to Arnold Avenue and Eldon Street respectively. To the north and south side of the stage, there were two rose gardens with seats on both sides. In addition, a pond for water plants was situated in the northeast corner of Grange Park, with another rose garden to its west and seats to its south. There was also a glasshouse in the southeast area of Grange Park, next to its south entrance.
By now, many changes have taken place in Grange Park. Most importantly, the fountain has been replaced by a large rose garden surrounded by seats. Similarly, the old stage has been demolished to make room for a new amphitheater for concerts. The rose garden and pond in the northeast corner have been replaced by a cafe and children's play area. Moreover, a water feature has been built on the southeast side of Grange Park, replacing the old glasshouse. There is also a new entrance for the underground car park next to the east side of the water feature.
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 73
- The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and year after It was refurbished The charts showed a result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 52
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1271.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76029962547 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59671864472 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475655430712 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 385.2 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.6152856151 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.7857142857 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14200635058 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587938759208 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446678805195 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108530757825 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039119977161 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.