The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (co2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden,Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant.
The line graph depicts the average of carbon dioxide emissed by each person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Overall, it can be manifested that, the United Kingdom produced the largest amount of carbon dioxide during the period whereas, least amount of co2 was emmited by a person in Portugal.
First of all, in the United Kingdom the carbon dioxide was emmited nearly about 10.5 tonnes in 1967 to 1997. But 1977 it follow reverse trend and touched the lowest point under 9 metric tonnes. While, in Italy at the starting of the period co2 was emmited 4 metric tonnes after a rapid increase it reach nearly about 7.9 metric tonnes in 2007.
Moreover, more then 8 metric tonnes co2 was emmited in Sweden between 1967 to 2007. But after a constant decrease it reaches to 6.5 metric tonnes in 1987 and in the last it drop-down to 4.9 metric tonnes. Whereas, in Portugal the amounts were lower at roughly 1.2 metric tonnes in 1967. But after it increase almost 5 metric tonnes in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-20 | kugyyy | view | |
| 2021-01-16 | iamketpatel | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-16 | iamketpatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-21 | Tran Ha | 73 | view |
| 2016-09-15 | kajal A. Patel | 84 | view |
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both the view and give your opinion 56
- The map below show the village of stokeford in 1930 and in 2010 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant
- The graph below gives information about Dubai gold sales in 2002 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The map below show the village of stokeford In 1930 And in 2010 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make it comparisons where relevant
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing for example through cell phone tracking and security cameras In many cases the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening Do you think the advantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
...carbon dioxide during the period whereas, least amount of co2 was emmited by a person i...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'follows'?
Suggestion: follows
...0.5 tonnes in 1967 to 1997. But 1977 it follow reverse trend and touched the lowest po...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reaches'?
Suggestion: reaches
...metric tonnes after a rapid increase it reach nearly about 7.9 metric tonnes in 2007....
^^^^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...etric tonnes in 2007. Moreover, more then 8 metric tonnes co2 was emmited in Swed...
^^^^
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...last it drop-down to 4.9 metric tonnes. Whereas, in Portugal the amounts were lower at ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, then, whereas, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69613259669 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.13391308525 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502762430939 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4342709885 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4444444444 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237213293105 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121964520341 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140561034962 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205274699186 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162592829393 0.0819641961636 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.