The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You

The given graph shows the changes in the emission of carbon dioxide per person in 4 European Countries in the period from 1967 to 2007.
The main feature of this graph is that Porugal and Italy experienced the increasing production of carbon dioxide, while United Kingdon and Sweden got the lowering carbon dioxide. However, it seen that and Portugal had been in the same rate at the end of the period.
The production of carbon dioxide in Portugal and Italy was steady escalating during that period. In 1967 emission of carbon dioxide in Portugal was more or less 1.8 metric tonnes and in 2007 the emission achieved approximately 5.8 metric tonnes. In Italy in the beginning of the period, it was a bit higher than 4. However, it increased to only 7.8 in 2007.
The emission of carbon dioxide in United Kingdom and Sweden was under decrease during the period of time. The emission of carbon dioxide in United Kingdom was the highest one among all these country. But after 1967, it gradually decreased to about 9 metric tonnes. The emission in Sweden was around 8.6 metric tonnes in the beginning. Then, it steady increased to 10,5 metric tonnes. However in 1977 it got tremendous decrease in the emission of carbon dioxide which underwent till 2007. In 2007, the emission in Sweden was at the same level with Portugal at around 5,4.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ission achieved approximately 5.8 metric tonnes. In Italy in the beginning of the...
^^
Line 4, column 91, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...nd Sweden was under decrease during the period of time. The emission of carbon dioxide in Unit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it gradually decreased to about 9 metric tonnes. The emission in Sweden was aroun...
^^
Line 4, column 345, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'steadies'?
Suggestion: steadies
...etric tonnes in the beginning. Then, it steady increased to 10,5 metric tonnes. Howeve...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 385, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...steady increased to 10,5 metric tonnes. However in 1977 it got tremendous decrease in t...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, then, while, more or less

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77155172414 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40057572737 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461206896552 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9733080776 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0714285714 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5714285714 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07142857143 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286419271735 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108148687671 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726875694586 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204358772949 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482938200661 0.0819641961636 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.