The line graph compares the changes in the average amount of carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal from the years 1967 up to 2007.Units are in metric tonnes.
Overall, UK and Sweden followed a downward trend in the graph, whereas the average carbon dioxide emissions in Italy & Portugal have gradually increased over the period of 40 years.
At the beginning of the period,UK produced the most significant amount of carbon dioxide per person( about 11 metric tonnes), followed by Sweden, Italy & Portugal, which produced approximately 9, 4, 1 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide respectively. A decade later, in 1977 the carbon dioxide emissions in Sweden rose to a peak of more than 10 metric tonnes, following which it experienced a considerable fall.
After 1987, the amount of carbon dioxide emitted per ca pita in Italy had outraced that in Sweden, reaching to about 8 metric tonnes in 1997, after which the figures remained constant for the duration of 10 years. At the end of the given period, the carbon dioxide production per person in Portugal and Sweden had reached the same value to less than 6 metric tonnes. However, in 2007, UK stilled produced the highest amount of carbon dioxide( about 9 metric tonnes), in comparison to the other three countries.
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Units
...Portugal from the years 1967 up to 2007.Units are in metric tonnes. Overall, UK an...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 31, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , UK
...years. At the beginning of the period,UK produced the most significant amount of...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02293577982 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59167054201 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509174311927 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.498151385 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.428571429 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1428571429 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297082275242 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170388750712 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976850475951 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230950289931 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955095453763 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.