The line graph illustrates the amount of carbon dioxide metric tonnes, which were produced per individual in 4 countries from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, it is immediately clear that there were upward trends in the quantity of Co2 emissions in Portugal and in Italy, while these figure of those in two remainders went down significantly over this period time.
The year 1967 experienced a far difference from the amount of Co2 emissions of 4 countries. Those of Uk was the highest, which stood at nearly 11 merit tonnes, following the second, the third and the final rank belonged to Sweden, Italy and Portugal, which were different in their figure, about 9 tonnes, 4 tonnes and 1 tonnes respectively. Over a decade, that of Co2 tonnes, produced per person in UK registered almost no change. Meanwhile the remainders witnessed similar trends, increasing rapidly by average 2 tonnes in every nation.
Obviously in the 40 years from 1977 to 2007 per civil of Uk and Sweden created CO2 metric tonnes, which decreased sharply, reaching their nadirs( roughly 9 and 5 tonnes). On the contrary, In Italy and Portugal continued to pick up nearly 8 and 5 tonnes. In conclusion, in 2007 the top of the quantity of Co2 emissions was apparent in Uk, furthermore, Sweden and Portugal were jointly the lowest.
- The diagram shows how fruit is canned.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 87
- The table below gives data on the hour of leisure time per year for people in Someland 84
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006 51
- Some people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools. Others, however, believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed schools.Discuss both these views and five your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...rson in UK registered almost no change. Meanwhile the remainders witnessed similar trends...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 395, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n and Portugal were jointly the lowest.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, second, so, third, while, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92237442922 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73958903767 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575342465753 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1885656434 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.777777778 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190217930967 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865010580148 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419163577183 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121527246831 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407507925169 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.