The number of men and women should be received similarly to learn subjects at colleges. I totally agree with this trend because of some feasible reasons.
First, nowadays, the society is being more and more equal in the importance of male and female. The gap between men and women seem to shrink and almost insignificantly. Unlike in the past, women had not chances to study and had responsibilities for families. However, recent decades, the female’s right have gained the respect of the society so they have been able to have educational opportunities. Therefore, it is apparent that the number of two genders, can go to school the same in colleges to study subjects, is necessary.
It is easy to realize that all two sets have enough abilities to access subjects in schools. In particular, females have health and strong to major in whole sectors. In fact that, there is a wide range of women, who are astronauts or pilots, are doing hard-workings for everyone. Women can become qualified employees provide that they are taught by the right ways. Furthermore, from men respectively, gentles also prove their talent in all fields such as subtle and clever, which people thinks to belong to women such as cooking, dancing and so on. Therefore, it is not any reason colleges for limiting subjects as genders.
In conclusion, in my point of view, I agree that the colleges should be created opportunities to study for males and females students the same due to the social equal and talents of students.
- The table below gives data on the hour of leisure time per year for people in Someland 78
- Universities should accept equal number of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000. 84
- The pie charts below show the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and 2007 89
- The pie chart shows information about water resources, and the bar chart shows the utilization of water in Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Canada. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...t that, there is a wide range of women, who are astronauts or pilots, are doing hard-wo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, similarly, so, therefore, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92941176471 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82381262196 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592156862745 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.345927881 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7857142857 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157339943603 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487729356876 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535101799679 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11141815477 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571101768814 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.