The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the UK Italy Sweden and Portugal between 1967and 2007

Essay topics:

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the UK, Italy, Sweden and Portugal between 1967and 2007.

The given line graph provides data about emissions which is made from carbon dioxide in every person in several countries which are you okay Sweden Italy portable over forty-years of period from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, what stands out in the graph is that there are severak significant fluctuations in five countries.
Another interesting point is that in high degree of emissions, UK and Sweden dropped during the period while in down degree,Italy and Portugal increased gradually.

Looking at the details in 1967 Italy and Portugal emissions of people stand out approximately 1 and 4 respectively. Afterwards, it was witness it higher rates during the period and these reached in 8 and 6 tonnes.

In the UK of population produced it carbon dioxide emissions in plenty rates it was about at 11 tonnes while Sweden rate consists l e s s emissions for every person than UK in 1967. Subsequently it was jumped significantly at the time you UKand Sweden's rates almost at the same tonnes in 1977 by 2007 these tonnes plunged rapidly to 9 and 5 respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-05-28 Sarvinoz9 78 view
2021-05-28 Sarvinoz9 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Italy
...d during the period while in down degree,Italy and Portugal increased gradually. Lo...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: s
...1 tonnes while Sweden rate consists l e s s emissions for every person than UK in 1...
^^^
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Subsequently,
...sions for every person than UK in 1967. Subsequently it was jumped significantly at the time...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93296089385 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87231256265 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597765363128 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3772958514 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.142857143 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27475045266 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114007534926 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811167403339 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132233458478 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625029431987 0.0819641961636 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.