The line-graph illustrates information about how many Vietnamese students studying in three countries namely France, Russia and America over a fifteen-year period.
In general, while the number of Vietnamese students enrolling in America and France schools risen, the opposite was true for Russia schools. Also, the data in America was highest during the period.
In 2000, France had the most Vietnamese pupil with about 3.5 millions, as opposed to roughly 3 millions and 1.5 millions in Russia and America respectively. In the next 5 years witnessed a significant upward trend of 2 millions in the number of America schools. By contrast, there was a substantial dip of nearly 3.5 millions in France and over 2.5 millions in Russia.
The figure for America grew up steadily at almost 5 millions, at the same time that in France soared sharply to about 4.5 millions after having a stabilization in a period 2005 to 2010. Meanwhile, the number of Vietnamese students in Russia declined steeply and tumbled at approximately 2 millions in 2010 before recovering gradually to 2.5 millions at the end of the period.
- The graph below shows the average number of Vietnamese students studying in France, America and Russia between 2000 and 2015 73
- Violence in playgrounds is increasing However it is important that parents should teach children not to hit back at bullies Discuss this view and give your own opinion Give reasons for you answer and include any relevant examples from you own knowledge or 78
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of the society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Violence in playgrounds is increasing. However, it is important that parents should teach children not to hit back at bullies. Discuss this view and give your own opinion.Give reasons for you answer and include any relevant examples from you own knowledge 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12637362637 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88589192058 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8133667795 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.625 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252876693494 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120014547201 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785867229634 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172100525022 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642491859492 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.