It is regarded that nurturing for children to being civilized citizens of society is a long-term and inundating with challenges mission. Despite the belief that this mostly relies on parents’ capacity, others support the school’s role in traning them to become decent society members. This essay will discuss both views and offer my opinion.
Several reasons can be observed for why teaching social responsibilities at school is vital. The first is the huge amount of knowledge and a well-rounded system schools have. Thanks to numerous materials and professional staff, teachers may provide children with trustable lessons about widely accepted rules and manners. Furthermore, the schools’ training systems are more effective. A good illustration could be parents with low literacy who may show some wrong customs to their offsprings. Schools with accurate and coherent initiatives will correct and direct them to change their minds about the wrong customs that they learned.
On the other hand, it has been held that the 1-to-3-year-old period is fundamental to every kid’s future. This can include physical and mental health, personality, and language development. As a result, if these perspectives are upbringing well parents, it would reap benefits to the kid’s future success in later years. Addiưtionally, children’s traits shape in a family environment is an undeniable fact. That is to say, kids spend their majority of time beside their parents and always mimicking their older family members. Take a father who usually respects his neighbor and helps the elderly as an example. His kids certainly learn these attitudes from him. Simply put, parents would be children’s role models and center of their attention. In summary, parents have great access to their children’s keys development phase and profound understandings of their offsprings’ uniqueness in communication and behavior.
In a nutshell, each party can bring distinguishing advantages in the teaching process. From my aspect, without one of two parties, it would be extremely challenging for the other one to tutor children to become good and adequate people for both their personal lives and society.
- The graph below shows consumers' average annual expenditure on cell phone, national andinternational fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010. The graph below shows consumers' average annual expenditure on cell phone, national andinternati 84
- The chart below shows information about students studying in six major subjects at the US university in 2010. 78
- Violence in playgrounds is increasing However it is important that parents should teach children not to hit back at bullies Discuss this view and give your own opinion Give reasons for you answer and include any relevant examples from you own knowledge or 78
- Violence in playgrounds is increasing. However, it is important that parents should teach children not to hit back at bullies. Discuss this view and give your own opinion.Give reasons for you answer and include any relevant examples from you own knowledge 56
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... both their personal lives and society.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, so, well, in summary, as a result, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51183431953 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97545483346 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633136094675 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9610326519 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.15 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236727397111 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062808372926 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483618619187 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143996548826 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054600615341 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.