The line-graph highlights data about consumers’average per annum amount of money spent in cell phone, national and international fixed-line and services in America, a nine-year between 2001 and 2010. Overall, it can be seen that there was a considerable upward trend in the expenditure of cell phone, whereas the national fixed-line services’expense saw a substantial fall over the period.
In 2001, around 700 dollars which was the highest expenditure came from national fixed-line services sector, then plummeted the next five years, at which point it levelled off at just 500 dollars, the same as cell phone in 2006. International fixed-line and services made up for about 230 dollars of the amount of money in comparsion with 200 dollars cell phone counterparts. The consumers’average expense of international fixed-line and services increased slowly but surely from 2001 to 2006.
There was a significantly plunge in the amount of money spent in national fixed-line services, reaching clearly 400 dollars. Standing at 750 dollars, the expenditure of cell phone was almost 2.5 times as much as that of international fixed-line and services.
- The chart below shows information about students studying in six major subjects at the US university in 2010. 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The graph below shows the average number of Vietnamese students studying in France, America and Russia between 2000 and 2015 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant. 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('significantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('plunge') instead of another adjective.
...t surely from 2001 to 2006. There was a significantly plunge in the amount of money spent in nationa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5393258427 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.64005060931 2.65546596893 137% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550561797753 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0779852033 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.857142857 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393012090401 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20233941799 0.103423049105 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102896070899 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289108958109 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118717706192 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.