The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufactures to produce vehicles at their US factories.
The line graph illustrates the average time spent on the manufacture of a car by four businesses in the US, namely General Motors, Ford, Toyota, and Honda, over a period of seven years starting in 1998. Overall, it can be clearly seen that the amount of time consumed by four automobile corporations witnessed a declining trend during the period given. Additionally, General Motors experienced the greatest drop of all four car companies.
Looking at the graph, the data indicate that in 1998, the production of General Motors was the highest, at 32 hours per vehicle. Followed by the length of time spent in Ford, at 28 hours. Besides, the production of Toyota equals that of Honda, at 22 hours, respectively.
The amount of time spent on production by General Motors suffered a significant decline, from 32 hours in 1998 to flattening out at 25 hours in 2004, and then hitting the lowest point at 22 hours in 2005. Ford car production reached a peak of 30 hours in 2001, and it plunged by 9 hours to reach a bottom of 21 hours in 2005. The figures for Toyota and Honda observed a quite similar trend, fluctuating throughout the period given and ending up at 20 hours per car in 2005. Over a period of 7 years, the rank of companies which consumed the most average time to produce cars in the US is similar to the one in 1998, with General Motors at 22 hours, Ford at 21 hours, and finally, Honda and Toyota at 20 hours.
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 67
- The table below shows the consumption of three basic foods wheat maize rice by people in four different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that to become the vegetarian is the only way to keep healthy Do you agree or disagree 87
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football While other people think that taking part in individual sports is better like tennis or swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The graph below shows changes in the share of vehicle registrations of the three most common types of commercial vehicles in the US between 1970 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, if, look, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55642023346 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59308088856 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494163424125 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4454687057 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.1 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256034215571 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112616326751 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731237260259 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190218353359 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428927799045 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.