The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories
The line graph illustrates the average time to produce a car by four companies in the US over a course of 17 years starting in 1998.
Overall, it is clear that the amount of time of production witnessed a decreasing trend in all factories during the period shown. General Motor had the most notable reduction among these companies.
In 1998, the production time of General Motor was the highest at 32 hours per vehicle, while the number of hours spent on producing a car of Ford was lower at 28 hours. Approximately 22 hours to produce a car were spent by both Toyota and Honda.
By 2005, there was a significant decrease in the amount of producing time per car to 22 hours for General Motor. Meanwhile, the figure for Ford rose slightly at 2001 to 31 hours before falling to 21 hours. By contrast, the manufacturing time of Honda and Toyota was a similar trend, fluctuated throughout the course and ended up at 20 hours per car.
- Early technological developments brought more benefits and changes to people’s life than the recent technological developments. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- In some countries, some high school leavers are choosing to work or travel for a period before going to university. Discuss advantages and disadvantages of those school leavers’ decision. Give your opinion. 73
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories 81
- Consumption of Fast Food in the UK 79
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 767.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56547619048 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62082596551 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4824471831 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.875 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28521309585 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121905470762 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842632077602 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176113831773 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849794588618 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.