the graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories
The line graph compares how long to manufacture a car by four different brands in the USA from 1998 to 2005.
Overall, the amount of time producing a car by four companies showed a fluctuating decline over the periods.
In 1998, the figure for General Motor stayed the highest among the given categories, which account for 32 hours, following that is Ford making up for 29 hours. However, they witnessed two opposite trends in the following years. While there was a substantial decrease of 25 hours for Motor in 2002, the figure for Ford rose to 31 hours in 2001. Then, Motor and Ford both went down at 21, 22 hours respectively in 2005.
In terms of Toyota and Honda, their starting point was the same at 22 hours in 1998. Despite an opposite fluctuation trend between Toyota and Honda by the year 2001, they showed the same pattern of decrease from 2002 to 2005, which both of them stayed at 20 hours at the end period
- (19/09/2015) Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The bar chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in Australia, divided into three categorises, from 2001 -2008 73
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different season 78
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph compares how long to manu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 763.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56886227545 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35189884171 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610778443114 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 209.7 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2484848207 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.375 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154885270818 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739286072155 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792607938314 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126347750331 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804694322779 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.