The graph below shows consumers' average annual expenditures on cell phone, national and international fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010.
The line graph illustrates the average amount of money spent on mobile phone, national and international fixed-line and services in America on a yearly basis during a decade starting from 2001.
It is noticeable that while the annual expenditure on cell phone experienced a significant increase, the opposite was true for that on national fixed-line services. In addition, the figure for international fixed-line services is the lowest among three kinds over the period shown.
In 2001, the average money spent on national fixed-line services of the US residents was approximately 700 dollars, in comparison with the expenditure of only around 250 dollars on international landline services and 200 dollars on mobile phone services. Over the next 5 years, a decrease of 200 dollars was witnessed in the expenditure of national fixed-line services, in contrast with the figure for cell phone services, which underwent a considerable growth of 300 dollars. At the same time, the average money poured into international landline services volatiled slightly around 300 dollars.
In 2006, the American consumers spent the same amount of money on national fixed-line and cell phone services, with 500 dollars on each. From 2006 to 2010, while the cell phone services’ figure showed an upward trend and hit the highest point in 2010 with 750 dollars, the yearly spending on national landline services fell moderately and was about 400 dollars at the end of the period. During the same period, the expenditure on overseas fixed-line services remained stable.
- map 11
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with 73
- Some people feel that children should be educated in single sex schools rather than mixed school To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The diagrams below show how glass containers such as bottles are produced in recycled 61
- In the past many male leaders had led our society to conflicts and violence The world would be better governed and more peaceful if it were ruled by women To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35918367347 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88407135057 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473469387755 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.0 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.993826832 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.888888889 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2222222222 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451401300281 0.215688989381 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207025916789 0.103423049105 200% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742965758051 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302228835951 0.15604864568 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400540560232 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.