The graph below shows consumers’ average annual expenditure on cell phone, national and international fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010.
The line graph illustartes the average amount of money spent anually on mobile phone services, and, national and international landline services in the US overa period of 9 years.
It is clear that while the yearly spending on mobile phones increased significantly, the opposite was true for national landline phone expenditure. Also, the figure for international fixed-line services was lowest during the period.
In 2001, there was an average of nearly $700 spent on national landline phone services by US residents, in comparison with only around $200 each on mobile phone and international landline services. Over the next five years, the average amount spent on national fixed-line phone services fell by approximately $200. By contrast, yearly spending on cell phone services witnessed a significant increase of roughly $300. At the same time, the figure for overseas landline services fluctuated slightly below $300.
In 2006, US consumers spent the same amount of money on mobile and national fixed-line services, with just over $500 on each. From the year 2006 onwards, it can be seen that the average yearly expenditure on mobile phone services surpassed that of national fixed-line phone services and became the most common means of telecommunication. To be more specific, yearly spending on mobile phone services increased to nearly $750 in the final year, while the figure for national landline phone services decreased to about $400 by the end of the period. During the same period, there was stability in the figure for overseas phone services.
- An increasing number of people are choosing plastic surgery Why do people choose to change the way they look Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- With the development of the medica online there is no future for the radio To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- With an increasing number of people eating fast food which if eating to regularly can cause health issues some people think that the only solution is ban it completely To what extent do you agree 84
- The picture below shows the plan of a museum in 1998 and after some changes were made in it in 2008 67
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26315789474 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85471900146 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445344129555 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 283.868780488 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6110272663 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.181818182 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72727272727 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314269204076 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14804692618 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644353460838 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222548020563 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318835237798 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.