The line graph compare the amount of fish, chicken, beef and lamb consumed weekly per person in a EU country over a period of 25 years. A glance at the line graph reveals that the consumption of chicken over the time increased noticeably while the fish was the least consumed item during the period.
Looking into the details, in 1979 beef was the most consumed meat with an average intake of 220 grams per person per week. Thereafter the beef consumption varied in the next 10 years before a steady drop and halved in 2004. The similar trend was seen in the intake of lamb which was consumed 150 grams by a person per week in 1979 and reduced to half of that in 2004. Fish consumption by people was the lowest throughout the 25 years period and dropped from average weekly consumption of 60 grams in 1979 to 40 grams in 2004. In contrast, the consumption of chicken grew over the 25 years period; people ate 150 grams of chicken on a weekly basis in 1979 which increase up to 250 grams in 2004.
In summary, people started consuming more chicken but less beef and lamb, and remained eating only small amount of fish after 25 years passed.
- Several languages die every year. Many people feel this is a positive trend and that a world with fewer languages promotes harmony and understanding between people. Analyze both sides of this argument and provide your opinion. 67
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 56
- Some people think it is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment for people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 72
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thereafter,
...ntake of 220 grams per person per week. Thereafter the beef consumption varied in the next...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, so, while, in contrast, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5023923445 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25165247652 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483253588517 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.0698243941 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.625 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177472290079 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911474289794 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373397264936 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108516960496 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540041342008 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.