The chart shows the proportion of people in UK donating to charity by different age groups for the years 1990 and 2010. Overall, for both years, majority of people donating money is aged 36 to 65 and people aged from 18 to 25 are the least to donate.
To specify, in 1990, people in the age group 36 to 50 had the biggest amount of donors with 42%, followed by the group 51 to 56 years old with 35%. The proportion of donors by age groups of 26-35 and over 65 years old are 31% and 32% respectively, which were almost doubled as the percentage of donors by the ages of 18-25. In comparison, in 2010, the ratio of 51 to 65 years old UK people contributing money to charity climbed to 39% and became the highest one. Meanwhile, the ratio of donors at the group 36-50 years old went down to 35%, which stayed equal with the group of over 65 years old. It is noticeable that the lowest rate was still in the group 18-25 years old with 7%.
In conclusion, 20 years after 1990, it is obvious that the proportion of donors to charity over 50 years old increased, while the opposite of rest decreased.
- Some people think it is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment for people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 72
- With the rise in the popularity of the internet newspapers will soon become the thing of the past To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 56
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.28846153846 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32151310074 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475961538462 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.0499500998 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.5 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18444988763 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107714667509 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677176694636 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149276967073 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647867909124 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.93 61.2550243902 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.9 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.