The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.» Write at least 150 words.

The line graph illustrates how much fish and 3 other kinds of meat namely chicken, beef and lamb was consumed by residents of a country in Europe from 1979 to 2004.

In general, the consumption of fish, lamb, and beef in the trend of decrease, meanwhile the amount of chicken was consumed showed a noticeable increase over the 25 years period.

Starting with more than 50 grams for each individual per week in 1979, there was a stable for the volume of fish was consumed in the next 25 years. In term of beef, after reached the peak at nearly 230 grams per person in the early years of the 80s, the consumption of product from beef dropped gradually to just over 100 grams for each person per week in 2004. A similar trend can be observed in lamb, the amount of that meat fall rapidly and hit the lowest point of 50 grams in 2000 and stabilize until 2004

On the other hand, though had the similar beginning at around 150 grams of meat like lamb in 1979. The consumption of chicken went in the totally different way, 25 years after 1979, the consumption of chicken rose significantly to around 250 grams per week.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, while, in general, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44859813084 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32199266273 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528037383178 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.4154901459 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5714285714 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139439227692 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073978660417 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486205023551 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101941962529 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452589620372 0.0819641961636 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.87 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.