The line graph illustrates how much fish and 3 other kinds of meat namely chicken, beef and lamb was consumed by citizens of a country in Europe from 1979 to 2004.
In general, the consumption of fish, lamb, and beef in the trend of decrease, while the amount of chicken was consumed showed a noticeable increase over the 25 years period.
According to the given data, there was a stable for the volume of fish with around 50 grams was consumed by each person. In term of beef, after reached the peak at nearly 230 grams per person in early years of the 80s, the consumption of product from beef dropped gradually to just over 100 grams for each in 2004. Similarly, the figure of lamb fall rapidly as well and hit the lowest point at 50 grams and stable during the following years.
On the other hand, though had the similar start with lamb at around 150 grams in the year 1979. The consumption of chicken went in the totally different way, showed the sharp rise in 25 years, then reached the number 250 grams in 2004.
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 31
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The charts below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 78
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, then, well, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46808510638 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19195409243 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563829787234 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4616708821 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 5.23603664747 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151967583752 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755514867504 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473395525961 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106780608849 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468676147845 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 78.93 61.2550243902 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.