The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979and 2004.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The changes in the consumption of fish and some other kind of meat over the period of 1979-2004 in a European country have been illustrated by this line graph.
In 1979, the most popular food among these was beef with about 225 grams of intake per person. Whereas, lamp and chicken had approximately similar amount of consumption (around 150 grams) with fish being the least consumed protein.
However, over the span of next 25 years , these numbers have shown a significant change. The partake of beef gradually declined from about 225 grams to 110 grams after fluctuating between 1979 and 1984. On the other hand, a gradual increase is noticed in the consumption of chicken that went to 250 grams from 140 grams per week becoming the highest taken food . Although the lamb also saw a sudden decrease in its consumption from 150 grams to around 70 grams over the years of 1979- 2004 , the per week intake of fish remained almost stable at approximately 50 grams throughout these 25 years .
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-28 | Horiya Modina | 78 | view |
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific world business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give yo 73
- Some people prefer to relax by doing physical activities while others choose mental activities Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ound 150 grams with fish being the least consumed protein. However, over the s...
^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... However, over the span of next 25 years , these numbers have shown a significant ...
^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...umbers have shown a significant change. The partake of beef gradually declined from about 2...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...per week becoming the highest taken food . Although the lamb also saw a sudden dec...
^^
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nd 70 grams over the years of 1979- 2004 , the per week intake of fish remained al...
^^
Line 5, column 595, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ately 50 grams throughout these 25 years .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80701754386 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50293541952 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608187134503 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2058393695 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.428571429 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111624437667 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603513022911 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878265054788 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116807172335 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108418348857 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.