The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the different 4 categories of fish and meat consumed by people, namely chicken, beef, lamb, fish over the course of 6 years, starting from 1979 and ending in 2004.
In detail, it is immediately obvious that chicken and beef are the major kinds of food consumed by people in a European country, and fish generated the minimum amount of energy in France. It also can be seen that a downward trend was experienced in beef, lamb, fish with the exception of chicken. Additionally, the three main kinds of food consumed were gone with strong fluctuation and fish only remained steady.
On the other hand, the major source of food: beef, standing at 220 grams. Then, this figure was inclined to move downward until 112 grams was consumed. Not only beef can be seen, but a similar trend was also witnessed in lamb (from 150 grams to 65 grams) and fish (from 65 grams to 41 grams).
On the sharp contrast, chicken is witnessed to experience an acceleration of consumer with time, starting from 147 grams in 1979, then, increased to 247 grams in 2004 although had less consumption than beef in a timescale..
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-05 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2024-05-05 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | baoquyen1906 | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-27 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-27 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant v 78
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 83
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 50
- Nowadays the environment is being threatened significantly What are the causes and consequences of this problem Give solutions for this problem 80
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...starting from 1979 and ending in 2004. In detail, it is immediately obvious tha...
^^^^
Line 2, column 270, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...end was experienced in beef, lamb, fish with the exception of chicken. Additionally, the three main k...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tuation and fish only remained steady. On the other hand, the major source of f...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ms and fish from 65 grams to 41 grams. On the sharp contrast, chicken is witnes...
^^^^
Line 4, column 226, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ess consumption than beef in a timescale..
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7193877551 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.544251223 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586734693878 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4403477341 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112203228564 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529739244095 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483433066406 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0807524942824 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504691404979 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.