The given line graph depicts how the popularity of the consumption of fish and three types of meat in a country in Europe from 1979 to 2004.
At the beginning of the period, beef and lamb experienced the highest numbers with 220 and 150 grams, respectively. Throughout the 16-year period, the amounts of beef and lamb consumed dropped to approximately 100 and 50 grams, respectively. Fish consumption also decreased but much less significantly to just below 50, and even though it was the less popular food, consumption levels were the most stable.
Turning to the figures for chicken, it came in third place in 1979 with 140 grams. During the 25-year period, there was a sharp increase in the consumption of chicken to nearly 250 grams in 2004.
Overall, there was a mix of changing patterns with respect to the figures for the consumption of fish and three types of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Throughout the period, the number of the use of fish was constantly receiving the lowest figures. Noticeably, the statistics of chicken recorded the most significant growth among all categories.
- Some claim that men are naturally more competitive than women To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- In some countries today many people decide to have their first child when they are older What are the reasons Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Time spent on smartphones and tablets by category 79
- Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The two maps below show the changes in the town of Stokeford from 1930 to 2010 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...country in Europe from 1979 to 2004. At the beginning of the period, beef and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, third, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94680851064 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79463448276 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537234042553 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7711275027 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.333333333 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183184443475 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074641581589 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863466992011 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126503867889 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697113817535 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.