The graph elucidates that the consumption of fish, beaf, lamb and chicken in an European country between 1979 and 2004. In a gist, there is irregular and disproportionate trends are mentioned for each. However, the units are measured by grams per person per week.
IN terms of lamb, fish and beaf considered as highest as the former, but lowest at the latter and exception of chicken. Then, the fish is witnessed at 65 grams in 1979 and it is slightly decreases for 10 grams then irregularities have been reported till 2004 at approximately 35 grams. In case of lamb, recorded at 150 grams in 1979 indeed, 80 grams in 2004. Subsequently, in the beginning it is larger rate for usage but the end smaller rate has been announced.
With regards of chicken placed 140 grams from former , but at the latter it is higher at 250 grams. Thereafter, the highest rate enjoyed as chicken in 2004. Next, beaf is published at 220 grams at the beginning, but thereafter, plunging slightly then it peaks up and again it is decreased the usage at around 120 grams in 2004. Meanwhile, chicken is observed as the highest rate of usage per person. Consequently, fish being very least usage and meat is furnished at highest rate of usage.
Having decoded the graph, the beaf considered at highest rate at starting but also in late it would be less has been monitored. However, irregular and disproportionate trends are followed in each consumpptions.
- The map below is of the town of Canterbury A new school s is planned for the area The map shows two possible sites for the school 69
- Some people say that education system is the only critical factor to development of a country To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- In the past, shopping was a routine domestic task. Many people nowadays regards it as a hobby. To what extend, do you think this is a positive trend. 84
- Computers have made the world a better place to live. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 89
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and eduction. Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizen themselves? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...tion of fish, beaf, lamb and chicken in an European country between 1979 and 2004....
^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... of chicken placed 140 grams from former , but at the latter it is higher at 250 g...
^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r it is higher at 250 grams. Thereafter, the highest rate enjoyed as chicken in 2...
^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gain it is decreased the usage at around 120 grams in 2004. Meanwhile, chicken is...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1192.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82591093117 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8408624535 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514170040486 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3404325267 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1428571429 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6428571429 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.09268292683 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100981309288 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447806485017 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759927684552 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789235503344 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606008539896 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.