The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph gives data on fish and meat consumption in a country belongs to Europe in 25 years from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, the consumption of fish had a negligible change between 1979 and 2004 whereas the rate of meat consumption fluctuated year by year.
From the line graph, beef was the most favorable meat in 1979. Each person used more than 200 grams beef per week. While chicken is the least preferred with consumption under 150 grams per week. In 25 years from 1979, there was a rapid fluctuation in consumption of three kinds of meat. The grams of chicken, beef and lamp each person used every week moved up and down. Until 2004, chicken became the most preferred meat in stead of beef. The amount of beef fell down to 125 grams. Lamb was the least favorable meat in stead of the second position in 1979.
Unlike meat, there was a negligible change in the consumption of fish. People ate fish much in 1979 with approx 70 grams per week. The smallest rate of fish consumption was in 1999, after that time this rate increased slightly before coming to nearly 40 grams again in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Lovepreet123 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | anasrafiq | 73 | view |
- Write about the following topic:Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places ? An how to increase its popularity ?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant. 73
- Leaders and directors in organizations are often older people. Some peple say that younger people could be leaders. Do you agree or disagree ? 67
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...used more than 200 grams beef per week. While chicken is the least preferred with con...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: IN_STEAD_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'instead of'?
Suggestion: instead of
... chicken became the most preferred meat in stead of beef. The amount of beef fell down to 1...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 517, Rule ID: IN_STEAD_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'instead of'?
Suggestion: instead of
...rams. Lamb was the least favorable meat in stead of the second position in 1979. Unlike...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56565656566 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26467710087 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530303030303 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.654015056 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.5384615385 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2307692308 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210733004966 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879283153503 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709731413186 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167029433452 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482763497125 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 13.2329268293 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 90.09 61.2550243902 147% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.63 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.29 8.06136585366 78% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.