The graph below shows the daily consumption of three spreads per person from 1981 to 2007 in a country.
The graph illustrates the consumption of 3 spreads since 1981 to 2007. The data were measured in grams. Overall, it can be seen that the data decreased significantly along decades although, in 1996, low fat & reduced spreads which was a dramatic increase.
Moving to a more detailed analysis, the consumption of butter was higher than margarine over three-quarter decades. In 1986s, the number of Butter was a fair increase, representing around 160 grams. However, butter consumption decreased dramatically almost 80 grams after fifteen years. In the same period, margarine was consumed by people which was a slight decline approximately 80 grams afterwards, the data increased gradually at 100 grams in 1991.
Moreover, from 1993s to 2007, the amount of butter continued to jump almost 50 grams in the last years. Following by margarine consumptions remained constant during three years, yet the trend showed a significant fall, accounting at 40 grams. In the 1996s, the consumption of low fat and reduced spreads began at a low level. Subsequently, low fat and reduced spreads grew rapidly in 2001 despite in the last period, it was a gradual decrease.
- in some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people why might this be the case 56
- say people say that computers have made life easier and more convince other people say that computers have made life more complex and stressful what is your opinion 67
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 56
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 84
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of the frog from the egg stage to an adult frog 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24731182796 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96491152222 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8949816292 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7272727273 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9090909091 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17163085102 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772461782502 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988659980295 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124541172761 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545452677497 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.