The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph indicates the weight of air pollutants discharged by three different sources: household, industry, transport compared to the total air contaminants in the period from 1990 to 2005.
Overall, the branch of industry is deemed to have been the main contributor to the total due to its figure surpassing two stakeholders remained while also witnessed the most significant downward trend.
From an initial point of around 1 million tonnes in 1990, homeowners started to detain their air emission to more or less 0.5 million tonnes before plummeting to 0.1 in 2005, making an overall fall of 0.7 million tonnes. During the same period, a more extreme collapse was pronounced in the case of manufacture from nearly 6 to 3.5 million tonnes, completing a plummet of 2.5 tonnes, which subsequently reaped its lowest point of 2 million tonnes in 2005. Transport, in contrast, starting from a low of 0.5 million tonnes, was recorded to inch its way by 0.3 in 1996 and continued to fluctuate to an end of 0.7 million tonnes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, in contrast, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98275862069 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77926304591 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632183908046 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 21.5536539826 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 173.4 112.824112599 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.8 22.9334400587 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 5.23603664747 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143327982612 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821347717125 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751048786254 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106616569996 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838610001965 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.