The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the employment rates of both males and females between 6 countries (Australia, Switzerland, Iceland, UK, New Zealand and USA) for the years 1995 & 2005. The employment units for all countries in the graph is in percentages.
Overall, the graph provides a comparative figure of employment for two years (1995 & 2005) which depicts that the numbers have improved from 1995 to 2005. In both years, Iceland records the highest percentage of men being employed in contrast to Australia recording the lowest figures. For females, Switzerland is at the top for the best employment figures overall, while placing New Zealand and Australia at the bottom.
In terms, in the both the years (1995 & 2005), the employed male percentage for Iceland stood above 70% and 80% respectively which is the highest between countries. Similarly, the Swiss females topped the employment figures across all countries in the bar chart with 1995 recording over 50% and 2005 was nearly 70%. At the bottom, Australian men maintain the least employment rates, constant for both years. However, the lowest employment rates for females were depicted in the graph between New Zealand and Australia for the years 1995 and 2005 respectively.
It is also observed that the employment figures for women in New Zealand jumped from just over 25% to nearly 40%. In addition, the percentage of females employed compared to males were nearly at half for both the years in Australia and New Zealand.
- You have seen an advertisement for a parttime volunteer to work with out pay for an organisation that helps local children You would like to do this work Write a letter to the head of the organisation In your letter Say why you are interested in this type 73
- The bar charts of HCT graduates by college in 1999. 67
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 67
- Many parents today organise extra classes for their children after school and at the weekends. Do you feel that this is a worthwhile thing to do or do you feel children have enough education at school? 56
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, similarly, so, while, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13692946058 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67929994828 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460580912863 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8602807026 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.545454545 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0579324741737 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361735907293 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443833303975 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0521628537594 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451565559352 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.