The graph below shows the fertility rate of women in different Gulf Countries from 1990 to 2000.
The provided bar graph compares the fertility rates of women in 6 different gulf countries between 1990 and 2000. The fertility rate of those women was compared in two different years with a gap of 10 years - 1990 and 2000. As is evident in the bar graph, the fertility rates declined over the decade in all the countries and women in Oman and Saudi Arabia had higher fertility rates than the women in the other four countries.
In 1990, the fertility rate for each woman in Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar and UAE was on an average between 3 to 4. However, this figures reduced to 2-3 by the year 2000. On the other hand, Omani and Saudi Arabian women had the highest fertility rates during both of the years. Oman had the largest number of childbirths per thousand woman, which was 7 in 1990 and just above 5 in 2000. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia remained in the second position with relatively a higher fertility rate. it is quite obvious to notice that the fertility rate of women in all these gulf countries reduced in 2000 than it was 10 years earlier.
To summarise, even though there was a decrease in the women fertility rates, Oman and Saudi Arabian women continued to show a fairly higher fertility rate among the women in these 6 gulf countries
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-24 | fachryadul92 | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-17 | Nguyễn Minh Hưng | 67 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 61
- The graph below shows the fertility rate of women in different Gulf Countries from 1990 to 2000. 67
- The graph below shows the fertility rate of women in six Gulf countries 56
- The graph below shows the fertility rate of women in six Gulf countries. 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Oman
...rtility rates during both of the years. oman had the largest number of childbirths p...
^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ith relatively a higher fertility rate. it is quite obvious to notice that the fer...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63963963964 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36996258128 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495495495495 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0215420945 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.491544867564 0.215688989381 228% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.216231740116 0.103423049105 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132178556281 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.372134756493 0.15604864568 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930153740074 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.