The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010.
The given line graph depicts the activities that the elderly in the USA did in their leisure time over the period of 30 years.
The initial impression from the graph is that while hiking, reading, watching TV and surfing the internet had upward trends among the aged Americans, there was a slight drop in the figures for theatre. Hiking was also the only activity with a sharp rocket over the given period.
Hiking which was among the least favorite activities of the elderly in the United States in 1980s experienced a dramatic surge until reaching a peak of 80% throughout the period surveyed. By contrast, starting at 60% - three times higher than hiking, watching TV was still a popular free time activity of the old in America with a constant soar by 10% over the first 20 years before sinking slightly to nearly 65% in 2010s.
Reading and surfing the Internet gained more and more popularity among the elderly in the USA whereas theatre lost its favor in this country. Over 20 years, reading oscillated significantly until hitting a low by 10% before a sudden leap to 60% in 2010s. Surfing the net saw which was about 5% in 1980s was tenfold increase in the last year of the period. Theatre was the only activity which had a downward trend among the elderly Americans from 1980s to 2010s.
- The given line graph illustrates clients average every year spending on mobile phone national and international land line and services 67
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 73
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee
- To succeed in a business one needs to be good at maths To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
...ies of the elderly in the United States in 1980s experienced a dramatic surge until reac...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2010s'.
Suggestion: in the 2010s
...s before sinking slightly to nearly 65% in 2010s. Reading and surfing the Internet gai...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2010s'.
Suggestion: in the 2010s
... low by 10% before a sudden leap to 60% in 2010s. Surfing the net saw which was about 5%...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 295, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
... Surfing the net saw which was about 5% in 1980s was tenfold increase in the last year o...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69736842105 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3425414059 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548245614035 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3302672601 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105718494179 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461310137411 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492914397399 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0804797330726 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056497856296 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.